Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
4.
Pneumon ; 35(3):1-7, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2044274

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic has overwhelmed the capacities of healthcare systems. Primary care physicians had a pivotal role in reducing the unnecessary access of suspected and confirmed cases to hospitals, and they substantially contributed to the success of vaccination programs. In this study, we aim to determine the role of the Greek private primary care pulmonologists (PPCPs) network during the first year of the pandemic. METHODS An electronic questionnaire consisting of 28 simple questions was administered to PPCPs by e-mail or by sharing a link in private social networking groups. RESULTS A total of 150 PPCPs completed the study. According to their answers, they examined a significant portion of suspected and confirmed COVID-19 cases, and they offered to several patients blood testing and chest radiography. PPCPS maintained close contact with both patients that had faceto-face assessment and patients managed remotely with a great number of telephone contacts. The majority of PPCPs provided information for COVID-19 vaccination by telephone for more than 20 patients weekly. CONCLUSIONS PPCPs offered high quality and specialized support for COVID-19 patients. Besides, they supported the national vaccination program by informing a substantial number of patients.

5.
ERJ open research ; 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1929447

ABSTRACT

Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) signaling is essential in both alveolar macrophages (AMs) differentiation and activation of lung immune cells [1]. Differentiated AMs are crucial in both the elimination of alveolar microbes and surfactant clearance. The disruption of the GM-CSF axis in alveolar macrophages leads to the development of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) [1]. In the majority of patients this relates to the presence of autoantibodies against GM-CSF autoimmune (a)PAP but there are multiple other causes [1, 2, 3]. GM-CSF deficient animals may have impaired lung inflammatory response to commensal microbes and humans with PAP may occasionally develop opportunistic lung infections [4]. The mainstay of pharmacological treatment in aPAP is inhaled GM-CSF which is off-label but increasingly used worldwide [5, 6, 7, 8, 9].

6.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 10(10): 2588-2595, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1907243

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: At the beginning of the pandemic, there have been considerable concerns regarding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity and outcomes in patients with severe asthma treated with biologics. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively observe a cohort of severe asthmatics treated with biologics for the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and disease severity during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Physicians from centers treating patients with severe asthma all over Greece provided demographic and medical data regarding their patients treated with biologics. Physicians were also asked to follow up patients during the pandemic and to perform a polymerase chain reaction test in case of a suspected SARS-Cov-2 infection. RESULTS: Among the 591 severe asthmatics (63.5% female) included in the study, 219 (37.1%) were treated with omalizumab, 358 (60.6%) with mepolizumab, and 14 (2.4%) with benralizumab. In total, 26 patients (4.4%) had a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 9 (34.6%) of whom were admitted to the hospital because of severe COVID-19, and 1 required mechanical ventilation and died 19 days after admission. Of the 26 infected patients, 5 (19.2%) experienced asthma control deterioration, characterized as exacerbation that required treatment with systemic corticosteroids. The scheduled administration of the biological therapy was performed timely in all patients with the exception of 2, in whom it was postponed for 1 week according to their doctors' suggestion. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that despite the initial concerns, SARS-CoV-2 infection is not more common in asthmatics treated with biologics compared with the general population, whereas the use of biologic treatments for severe asthma during the COVID-19 pandemic does not seem to be related to adverse outcomes from severe COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Biological Products , COVID-19 , Adrenal Cortex Hormones , Asthma/drug therapy , Asthma/epidemiology , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Respiration ; 100(7): 588-593, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1171560

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: During the first COVID-19 wave, a considerable decline in hospital admissions was observed worldwide. AIM: This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess if there were any changes in the number of patients hospitalized for respiratory diseases in Greece during the first CO-VID-19 wave. METHODS: In the present study, we evaluated respiratory disease hospitalization rates across 9 tertiary hospitals in Greece during the study period (March-April 2020) and the corresponding period of the 2 previous years (2018-2019) that served as the control periods. Demographic data and discharge diagnosis were documented for every patient. RESULTS: Of the 1,307 patients who were hospitalized during the study period, 444 (35.5%) were males with a mean (±SD) age of 66.1 ± 16.6 years. There was a 47 and 46% reduction in all-cause respiratory morbidity compared to the corresponding periods of 2018 and 2019, respectively. The mean incidence rate for respiratory diseases during the study period was 21.4 admissions per day, and this rate was significantly lower than the rate during the same period in 2018 (40.8 admissions per day; incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.525; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.491-0.562; p < 0.001) or the rate during 2019 (39.9 admissions per day; IRR, 0.537; 95% CI, 0.502-0.574; p < 0.001). The greatest reductions (%) in the number of daily admissions in 2020 were observed for sleep apnoea (87% vs. 2018 and 84% vs. 2019) followed by admissions for asthma (76% vs. 2018 and 79% vs. 2019) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (60% vs. 2018 and 51% vs. 2019), while the lowest reductions were detected in hospitalizations for pulmonary embolism (6% vs. 2018 and 23% vs. 2019) followed by tuberculosis (25% vs. both 2018 and 2019). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The significant reduction in respiratory admissions in 2020 raises the reasonable question of whether some patients may have avoided seeking medical attention during the COVID-19 pandemic and suggests an urgent need for transformation of healthcare systems during the pandemic to offer appropriate management of respiratory diseases other than COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitalization/trends , Respiratory Tract Diseases/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Asthma/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Greece/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Pulmonary Embolism/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/epidemiology , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/epidemiology
8.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 7: 616292, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1000109

ABSTRACT

Background: There is an amenable need for clinically applicable biomarkers in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW) has been recently suggested as a prognostic biomarker for COVID-19. Methods: This was an observational study enrolling patients between February 26 and May 15 2020. We aimed to validate the association of the previously published RDW threshold of 14.5% with markers of disease progression and mortality. Results: A total number of 193 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were enrolled and analyzed. Median age was 61 years (95% CI: 58-64). Patients with baseline RDW ≥14.5% (n = 41, 19.2%) presented with more progressive disease compared to patients with baseline RDW <14.5% (n = 156, 80.8%) as indicated by significant differences in maximum FiO2% during hospitalization (median: 100, 95% CI: 45.2-100, vs. 35, 95% CI: 31-40, p = 0.0001, respectively). Values of RDW ≥14.5% were also strongly associated with increased risk of mortality (HR: 4.1, 95% CI: 0.88-19.23), (p = 0.02). Conclusion: Our study provides evidence to support reproducibility and validity of a specified cut-off threshold of RDW as biomarker of disease severity and mortality in patients with COVID-19.

9.
ERJ Open Res ; 6(3)2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-751246

ABSTRACT

The Greek experience reveals that harmonised collaboration among primary care, secondary facilities, designated hospitals and official authorities results in prompt and accurate management of the pandemic-related crisis of COVID-19 https://bit.ly/3eSHVhG.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL